Reported essay questions are from students who have taken their IELTS test. *when i talk about effective concise goals, im basically saying, yeah look at a year here and there, it looks like nasa is spinning their wheels, but really the growth of space flight technology is so slow compared to the potential of space flight, that we have a long way to go, and naturally starting out with any sort of venture, you have to spend a lot of money at first to get off the ground (pun sort of intended lol). I would like to add something that will be to agree with this article. Twelve years had passed since the Soviet Union launched the space age by firing Sputnik I into earth orbit on October 4, 1957. . the corporations will move in whenever they see opportunity for solid profit, but it is always science, and often government funded research, that finds those opportunities in the first place.for example you mention satellites which are an integral part of the global communications industry, which in itself would not exist without first having the invention of telephone wires, radio waves, etc., all which have led up to space satellites.as for the prospects of space tourism again that is simply a result of the fact that governments have funded space research for all these years and finally it is getting to a point where its cheap enough and safe enough to send paying citizens up there.corporations will not do anything that doesnt guarantee profit so will they investigate whether there is water on the moon? I understand the satellite tech side of itbut there are other missions that should be scrubbed and the money used to build housing for homeless vets. In order to help make up your mind we outline next the most important benefits and problems of space exploration. For me, its more important than ever to reintroduce a sense of physical exploration, to get out there into strange, hostile and challenging environments. U.S. engineer Gene Gregory is also a writer specializing in economic and technological questions. NASA is very damgerous. There is probably 99 per cent of deep oceans and all of space to left explore, and it is only by putting humans into new physical locations that well be able to make genuine and crucial scientific discoveries. In this age of global problems, the necessity of co-operation in space as human beings with predominantly common interests cannot but have a feedback on earth. it is a large, profitable, and useful industry. The money gets circulated here on the ground. And something is going to happen and we will ALL be dead or starving on this planet because we refused to move on and advance the survival of our species; all pissed away on supporting some people that would probably just as soon let us starve if we were the ones without food and they were the rich ones. They knew the risks, and they took it for the sake of knowledge.It is also not meaningless, how is it meaningless? It is estimated that the total annual budget of space agencies is $41.8 billion. This could be good but how many people can we get there? Whos to say that we cannot disprove this as well? This time and dedication could be focused on ending famine or building developing countries. Besides, learning about the ocean floor, while that is important, is no more important than space. How many lives would have been drastically worser if these inventions werent invented yet? The competition for first place on the moon was intense, as was the pressure to succeed. The knowledge that space exploration provides is crucial for developing areas from medicine to the military. Established in 2002, the GEM Report is an editorially independent report, hosted and published by UNESCO. Those dollars could have been spent on other things, you say that people have always found a way to provide for themselves, that we shouldnt waste our time trying to feed the less fortunate. Not joking, thank you for that.However flawed your analogy is the title money is better used to help human lives in their own country is interesting. Are there better ways to spend public funding? Our Earth is also nearlly completely explored except for the oceans depths which are frankly impossible to get to the bottom too. Yet the basic question was still being asked: "Is this trip really necessary?". These include the disappearance of the rainforest, the pollution of the oceans, and increased desertification of an area about the size of England every year. Think about it as you would from ancient events in Eurasia. we dont know the answer to that obviously, but we do know how the world would have been affected by not having these inventions. In this chart, shades of blue represent mandatory spending programs; shades of orange are discretionary programs that require annual appropriations by Congress. If we continue space exploration we could probably find a planet that has water or oxygen. Space travel has given us a lot of new things for example the micro chip, the CAT scan and so on. And what about over coming poverty? This house believes that in a time of collapsing national economies and worldwide austerity measures, investment in space is a bad use of resources. Production of these product leads to redevelopment, sales and distribution all of which leads to more jobs; somebody has to build, sell, and repair.One last point, we know that Russia and China have both put men in space and now even more countries are getting involved. American and Soviet rockets are launching European, Australian and Japanese satellites into space. This will explain why I think this, and why others think this as well. Poverty stretches back to beginning of history. no. Im not saying that money will save the world, but I think if the right people have the big money, they could definitely create a positive impact on our earth, or even the universe. Solving these challenges feeds back into the terrestrial economy. Why is space exploration awesome? . These are the general crises that are coming to the planet, quite apart from the economic ones were so obsessed with at the moment. NASA has experimented with so much metal costing more than $238 billion. 1. If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option. For example, NASA created Velcro which is now used in many clothing items, bags and so forth. the grown ups and children had to go into space and live in a giant space ship because the world ended. We are also in a climate crisis and not spending money on helping the environment. The Petn is interesting because this is where the Maya were. Alpha Centauri, one of the closest stars to earth, is only 4.4 Light Years away. Jobs for educated individuals and less for food stampstough decision. Yes it is not necessarily a waste as such, but more of the fact that the money could be used for something more important. Imagine only if we would have pursued alternative energy resources with the effort, time and money we had spent in the space program. get together, or just stay out there take your satellites and leave us alone weirdos. . It is also some sort of misconception that the government is supposed to support and spend money to govern, police and protect the citizens of the country, when in fact that is the states job, or more specifically, each citizen, and his or her families job to do so. there is intelligent life on other planets. There are many reasons we should continue space exploration, but i cant fit them all in one essay so here are some more examples. We should not waste any precious dime on black stuff. Comments on: Space Exploration Is a Waste of Money No you told wrong space exploration used for future think bro once we can spend billion dollars on earth but again it will be destroyed by humans only better to spend on space human are the destroyer haow much you spend no use By: Srujan One could make the conclusion that Space exploration is good for the economy, causing more jobs (less poor people). For example, SpaceXs reusable rocket that is expected to reduce launch costs for commercial satelites, Bigelow Aerospaces investment in space tourism, and Virgin Galactics expected space-faring plane, among others.Now that private companies are intending to supply space access on the cheap, it is useless to spend all that money on expensive platforms such as the space shuttle. When Neil Armstrong first stepped foot on the moon it wasnt just a victory for him and Buzz or even just America. Stop commenting on here, go dedicate your life to helping the starving and needy. The amount of money NASA receives is a small amount a really small amount. The 'super expensive waste of money' of sending Mar's Curiosity rover only cost about . Imagine putting that money to something useful, like bettering the planet we live on or literally anything else that is productive. Billions of dollars are floated away each rocket that is tested, of which couldve been used to provide homes, food, and lives to people without them. Our phones are tiny computers! third reason is economy of the 20 billion$ that NASA gets its not like they are putting it in a rocket and sending it to space it goes towards the salaries of the most skilled engineers and thus it gets back to the economy when those engineers use that money In 2021, countries around the world spent $92 billion, an 8 percent increase from the previous year on Space exploration. Last update: 20 April 2023 Colossal strides in civilization in the past have followed each major advance in man's observation of the skies. In terms of cost, computers used to cost thousands of dollars. SPaCe eXPLoration: "Space exploration is a waste of time and money" the SPaCe eXPLoration deBate in ConteXt an expensive and dangerous distraction? and why are we exploring space?? well what will happen when those resources run out? No-one is going to argue against the value of knowledge but there is a greater value in spending more on food supplies which has a certain result of feeding the hungry, whereas certain results are not present in the theory of discovering a sustainable planet. Listen, in order to advance our civilization, we must reach past our comfort zone. You've altered everything. There are many things in our world that have not discovered yet; do cures to AIDS and cancer ring a bell? One recent news story about a lost tribe also highlighted the fact that we are not in contact with all indigenous peoples across the planet.The scientific knowledge obtainable from our own planet, particularly organisms that inhabit locations with extreme conditions, offers far more value than that of space. And so the question of investment in space isnt one of throwing good money after bad. But we best be usin some money to go to space and get them cuz theres this dude named Daniel who needs a damn cupcake in his face.Last thing, I wouldnt apply to it as Space Invasion until we find actual life on a planet besides our own, which will never happen unless we explore, therefore, until we explore space more, your argument is invalid!!! When our planet is unbelievably polluted? The way to do that is not to go charging off into Space, wasting unbelievable quantities of money in pursuit of some chimera that we might in one day come back with some valuable mineral.
San Jose Surf Tournament,
Is It Bad To Be A Part-time Student,
East Longmeadow, Ma Death Records,
Mister Jiu's Tasting Menu,
Chiang Mai Golf Promotion,
Articles S
space exploration is a waste of money debate
