TEDx. And companies such as Google also have policies requiring employees to seek permission before engaging in public speaking in which sensitive information might be leaked. In public speaking, we use ethical standards to determine what and how to exchange messages with our audience. In public speaking, we use ethical standards to determine what and how to exchange messages with our audience. Ethics in Public Speaking After reading this section, the student will be able to: Explain the legal, cultural, philosophical, and social origins of ethics in public speaking Explain the difference between plagiarism and correct appropriation of source materials Understand the value of ethics in building a solid reputation as a speaker As you read further in this chapter . For example, a speaker advocating the overthrow of a government might use the term regime change instead of revolution; similarly, proponents of genocide in various parts of the world have used the term ethnic cleansing instead of extermination. By listening critically to the gist of a speakers message as well as the specific language he or she uses, we can see how that speaker views the world. We advocate truthfulness, accuracy, honesty, and reason as essential to the integrity of communication. My personal opinions are just as good as facts, so I dont bother to distinguish between the two during my speech. To maintain yourcredibilityand reputation. If information is obtained from printed or publicly distributed material, its perfectly appropriate to use that information without getting permission, as long as you cite it. If you cited the revised number (38.5 percent) from the paragraph, you would be further spreading incorrect information. Flashcards. Hearing is an accidental and automatic brain response to sound that requires no effort. Ultimately, honoring free speech and seeking out a variety of perspectives is very important for all listeners. Give Your Audience Respect Everyone deserves respect, and the audience listening to your speech is no exception. (1999). As such, we as speakers should be acutely aware of how an audience may perceive words that could be considered bigoted. (2001). Ethical speakers are ones who do not plagiarize their material or try to pass off words and ideas from others as their own. However, if a speaker read the paragraph and said the following during a speech, it would be plagiarism: According to Wrench DiMartino, Ramirez, Oviedio, and Tesfamariam, in a study of 130 participants, only 38.5 percent of the responses were completely honest. In this case, the speaker is attributing the information cited to the authors of the paragraph, which is not accurate. Explain why ethics are important in public speaking. Labour has welcomed the government's NHS workforce plan but says it comes too late to solve the crisis in the health service. Below you will find the statement in its entirety. While our predictions of short-term and long-term consequences may not always be right, we have an ethical duty to at least think through the possible consequences of our speeches and the actions we encourage. Ethics Ethics has to do with social norms regarding right and wrong. When you as a speaker truly care about your audiences needs and desires, you avoid setting up a manipulative climate. The study of ethics is incredibly important to any student of public speaking, as the most effective public speakers are those who practice ethical behavior in their speeches. As speakers, examine your information sources and determine whether they are biased or have hidden agendas. Speakers tend to fall into one of three major traps with plagiarism. Showing respect to your audience is directly correlated to how your message is received. Test. In this chapter, we will explore what it means to be both an ethical speaker and an ethical listener. This chapter explores ethics and ethical communication in public speaking. Listeners should try to objectively analyze the content and arguments within a speech before deciding how to respond. Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices. The remark would be likely to prompt accusations of anti-Semitism and to distract listeners from any constructive suggestions the official might have for resolving budget issues. The authors make it clear that they did not produce the television show House or conduct the study that found that only 38.5 percent of statements were completely honest. Public Speaking Exploring Public Speaking 3e (Barton and Tucker) 3: Ethics in Public Speaking 3.2: Credibility and Ethics Expand/collapse global location 3.2: Credibility and Ethics Last updated; Save as PDF Page ID 17741; Kris Barton & Barbara G. Tucker; Florida State . In 1999, the National Communication Association officially adopted the Credo for Ethical Communication (see the text box). These terms and definitions come from Public Speaking: The Virtual Text chapter 3 by Alyssa Millner, King College & Rachel Price, University of Kentucky. While we will talk in more detail about plagiarism later in this book, we cannot emphasize enough the importance of giving credit to the speakers and authors whose ideas we pass on within our own speeches and writing. As listeners or consumers of communication, we should realize that this diversity of perspectives enables us to be more fully informed on a subject. If you do not tell your audience where you found that information, you are plagiarizing. Ive used information in my speech from a friend or colleague that probably shouldnt be repeated. It is also important to be honest about where all your information comes from in a speech. This means everyone in the country has a. First, Wrench, DiMartino, Ramirez, Oviedio, and Tesfamariam may have mistyped the information. One of the earliest discussions of ethics in communication was conducted by the ancient Greek . Ethical public speaking is not a onetime event. Chapter 1: Why Public Speaking Matters Today, Chapter 9: Supporting Ideas and Building Arguments, Chapter 10: Introductions and Conclusions, Chapter 15: Understanding Small Group Communication, Chapter 16: Small Groups & Decision Making, http://www.natcom.org/Default.aspx?id=134&terms=Credo, Table 4.1 Public Speaking Ethics Checklist, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, Instructions: For each of the following ethical issues, check either true or false.. Of course, this does not just affect the listener in the public speaking situation. The second plagiarism trap public speakers fall into is paraphrasing what someone else said or wrote without giving credit to the speaker or author. If so, why? Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). The study of ethics in human communication is hardly a recent endeavor. The last statement of NCAs ethical credo may be the most important one. It is perfectly normal for speakers to want to share their own personal opinions and feelings about a topic; however, it is also important to highlight information within a speech that represents your own thoughts and feelings. The second reason we do not re-cite someone elses sources within our speeches is because its intellectually dishonest. Questions of right and wrong arise whenever people communicate. Extremist speakers sometimes attempt to disguise their true agendas by avoiding bigoted buzzwords and using mild-sounding terms instead. As public speakers, one of the first ethical areas we should be concerned with is information honesty. I do not know who my sources of information are or what makes my sources credible. What is the difference between global and patchwork plagiarism? In the previous sentence, we placed quotation marks around the sentence to indicate that the words came from the American Psychological Association and not from us. While we always want our speeches to be as persuasive as possible, we do ourselves and our audiences a disservice when we downplay, distort, or refuse to mention important arguments from the opposing side. Moreover, ethical communication enhances human worth and dignity by fostering truthfulness, fairness, responsibility, personal integrity, and respect for self and others. Hopefully, intimidation, coercion, and violence will not be part of your public speaking experiences, but some public speakers have been known to call for violence and incite mobs of people to commit attrocities. For example, individuals who work for the Central Intelligence Agency are legally precluded from discussing their work in public without prior review by the agency. (2001). Because different cultures have different norms about right and wrong, ethics is a very contested zone in all aspects of human encounters. If you do not tell your audience where you found that information, you are plagiarizing. To explain this problem, lets look at a brief segment from a research paper written by Wrench, DiMartino, Ramirez, Oviedio, and Tesfamariam: The main character on the hit Fox television show House, Dr. Gregory House, has one basic mantra, Its a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. For example, you may have read a book and learned that there are three types of schoolyard bullying. The Ethics Pyramid The word "ethics" can mean different things to different people. However, when you have a great anecdote one of your friends told you in confidence, or access to information that is not available to the general public, it is best to seek permission before using the information in a speech. When you as a speaker truly care about your audiences needs and desires, you avoid setting up a manipulative climate. Differentiate between morality and ethical dilemma. Therefore we, the members of the National Communication Association, endorse and are committed to practicing the following principles of ethical communication: Source: http://www.natcom.org/Default.aspx?id=134&terms=Credo. Understand how to apply the National Communication Association (NCA) Credo for Ethical Communication within the context of public speaking. about Facebook, research ethics, and data policy changes. Im using information in my speech that a source gave me even though it was technically off the record.. Extreme remarks made by politicians, media commentators, and celebrities, as well as ordinary people, can unexpectedly go viral with regrettable consequences. This chapter addresses ethics in public speaking. Ultimately, a speaker will be more persuasive by using reason and logical arguments supported by facts rather than relying on emotional appeals designed to manipulate the audience. We believe that unethical communication threatens the quality of all communication and consequently the well-being of individuals and the society in which we live. As a speaker, should you use evidence within a speech that you are not sure is correct if it supports the speechs core argument? We promote communication climates of caring and mutual understanding that respect the unique needs and characteristics of individual communicators. Ethical speakers do not deceive their audience. After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Define ethics and explain why ethics are important in public speaking. Washing ones hands of responsibility is unacceptable: all speakers should accept responsibility for the short-term and long-term consequences of their speeches. In the centuries since Platos time, an entire subfield within the discipline of human communication has developed to explain and understand communication ethics. But is. Shiffrin, S. H. (1999). Whether it is an ethical lapse in a business plan or a disagreement about medical treatment in end-of-life choices, people come into contact with ethical dilemmas regularly. 1. These two groups of authors are given credit for their ideas. TED Institute . Avoiding controversy Controversial topics tend not to lead to great public speaking, as the audience may be split on what they think about it. When you think of ethics, what comes to mind? Direct Quote. Failing to cite your sources might result, at best, in lower credibility with your audience and, at worst, in a failing grade on your assignment or expulsion from your school. The third plagiarism trap that speakers fall into is re-citing someone elses sources within a speech. Dissent, injustice and the meanings of America. Join or support innovators from around the globe. Our universitys policies regarding Academic Integrity can be found here. As you read further in this chapter . Nothing alienates an audience faster than a speaker with a hidden agenda unrelated to the stated purpose of the speech. Listening is active, focused, and concentrated attention for the purpose of understanding the meanings expressed by a speaker. We will discuss more about ethical sources of information in Chapter 7 Researching Your Speech later in this book. Although the official might insist that he meant no offense, he damaged the ethical climate of the budget debate by using a word associated with bigotry. This ethical principle is very important for all speakers. We advocate sharing information, opinions, and feelings when facing significant choices while also respecting privacy and confidentiality. This notion that everybody lies is so persistent in the series that t-shirts have been printed with the slogan. Here we are reminded that ethical communication is not just about what you say. Every time you plan to speak to an audiencewhether it is at a formal speaking event or an impromptu pitch at your workplaceyou have ethical responsibilities to fulfill. Where did ethics originate? If everyone only listened to one source of information, then we would be easily manipulated and controlled. Its just a speech. At its heart, ethics refers to the concept of having morally acceptable values and behaviors. Stand up, Speak out by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Foundations of Public Speaking. using someone elses words or ideas without giving credit, according to Merriam Websters Dictionary of Law, free speech entails the right to express information, ideas, and opinions free of government restrictions based on content and subject only to reasonable limitations (as the power of the government to avoid a clear and present danger) esp. As ethical speakers, it is important to always cite your sources of information within the body of a speech. Although it is certainly not always the speakers fault if someone commits an act of violence, the speaker should take responsibility for her or his role in the situation. I havent really thought about the short- or long-term consequences of my speech. See all articles on Ethics. 3.1 - Ethical Stances on Public Speaking. (2011, May 5). We will cover conflict of interest in more detail on the next page. The NCA Credo for Ethical Communication is designed to inspire discussions of ethics related to all aspects of human communication. Typically, the only information you do not need to cite is information that is general knowledge. We live in a society where a speakers message can literally be heard around the world in a matter of minutes, thanks to our global communication networks. Legal scholar Steven H. Shiffrin has argued in favor of some symbolic speech (e.g., flag burning) because we as a society value the ability of anyone to express their dissent against the will and ideas of the majority (Shiffrin, 1999). Introduction to Speech Communication by Individual authors retain copyright of their work. As ethics is an important part of our daily lives, it also plays a significant role in any public speaking situation. To engage in unethical behavior when speaking only erodes that trust. Acknowledging and responding to conflicts of interest is also regarded as ethical public speaking behavior. Ethical communication is fundamental to responsible thinking, decision making, and the development of relationships and communities within and across contexts, cultures, channels, and media. Washington, DC: Author, p. 349. TED Fellows. Whether you are persuading people to vote for a political candidate or just encouraging them to lose weight, you should know what the short-term and long-term consequences of that decision could be. In a study conducted by Turner, Edgley, and Olmstead (1975), the researchers had 130 participants record their own conversations with others. Surprisingly, research has shown that most people do lie during interpersonal interactions to some degree. A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world. It is a branch of philosophy that deals with right and wrong. Shiffrin, S. H. (1999). Thus far in this section weve introduced you to the basics of thinking through the ethics of public speaking. When speaking informally, people sometimes use air quotes to signal direct quotationsbut this is not a recommended technique in public speaking. What are the ethics involved in public speaking? We strongly believe that you can become a better, more ethical speaker. In the middle of your speech you talk about those three types of schoolyard bullying. 7.1 Why is Organizing and Outlining Important? The perspective of that candidate would be so narrow that you would have no way to accurately understand and assess the issues at hand or the strengths and weaknesses of the opposing candidates. 1. The consequences for failing to cite sources during public speeches can be substantial. As such, we as speakers should be acutely aware of how an audience may perceive words that could be considered bigoted.
Is Supplying Alcohol To Minors A Felony,
Jax Magic Basketball Tournaments,
Biomes O' Plenty Level-type Server,
Shore Acres Mobile Home Park Lake Elsinore,
Lafayette's Music Schedule,
Articles W
what is ethics in public speaking
